Hassett v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Seitz J.

Hassett v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

ROBERT W. HASSETT, III, § § Defendant Below- § No. 253, 2017 Appellant, § § v. § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Cr. ID No. 0005011315 (S) Plaintiff Below- § Appellee. §

Submitted: August 9, 2017 Decided: August 10, 2017

Before VAUGHN, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

This 10th day of August 2017, after careful consideration of the

appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, the appellant’s

response to the motion, and the record, we conclude that the judgment below

should be affirmed on the basis of, and for the reasons stated in, the Superior

Court’s well-reasoned decisions dated May 25, 2017 and May 30, 2017. The

Superior Court did not err in concluding that the appellant’s fourth motion for

postconviction relief was procedurally barred and that the appellant failed to

overcome the procedural hurdles. We also find no abuse of the Superior

Court’s discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to recuse the assigned

judge. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Justice

2

Reference

Status
Published