Courtney v. Acosta
Courtney v. Acosta
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DAVID COURTNEY,1 § § Respondent Below, § No. 288, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below: Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware § CHRISTINE ACOSTA, § File No. CN15-01320 § Petition No. 18-35648 Petitioner Below, § Appellee. § § IN THE INTEREST OF: § RAFAEL COURTNEY §
Submitted: October 29, 2019 Decided: November 5, 2019
ORDER
(1) On September 9, 2019, the Senior Court Clerk sent a letter directing the
appellant to pay the Family Court filing fee and transcript cost on or before
September 24, 2019, or this Court would issue a notice to show cause why the appeal
should not be dismissed. On September 25, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a
notice, sent by certified mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal
should not be dismissed for the appellant’s failure to pay the Family Court filing fee
and transcript cost.
1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d). (2) The notice to show cause was sent to the address that the appellant
provided in the notice of appeal, but postal records indicate that a notice of attempted
delivery was left because no authorized recipient was available. The Chief Deputy
Clerk resent the notice to show cause on October 18, 2019, by first-class mail.
(3) The appellant having failed to respond to the notice to show cause
within the required ten-day period or to report any change of address to the Court,
dismissal of this action is deemed to be unopposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)
and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura Acting Chief Justice2
2 Pursuant to DEL. CONST. Art. IV, §§ 2, 13.
2
Reference
- Status
- Published