Stanford v. State
Stanford v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
SHAMAR T. STANFORD, § § Defendant Below, § No. 284, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1511011810 (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: September 23, 2019 Decided: November 14, 2019
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion
to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be
affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court’s order,
dated June 5, 2019, adopting the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation
dated March 8, 2019 and summarily dismissing the appellant’s second motion for
postconviction relief. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
2
Reference
- Status
- Published