Stanford v. State
Stanford v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHAMAR T. STANFORD, § § Defendant Below, § No. 284, 2019 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1511011810 (N) § Plaintiff Below, § Appellee. § Submitted: September 23, 2019 Decided: November 14, 2019 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court’s order, dated June 5, 2019, adopting the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation dated March 8, 2019 and summarily dismissing the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.