IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LUTHER FOREHAND, § § No. 147, 2022 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 2009006411 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Appellee. § § Submitted: May 18, 2022 Decided: June 22, 2022 Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and VAUGHN, Justices.

ORDER After careful consideration of the opening brief, the motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, the Court concludes that the judgment of the Superior Court should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s April 13, 2022, order denying the appellant’s motion for reduction or modification of sentence. The Superior Court sentenced the appellant for possession of a deadly weapon by a person prohibited to fifteen years of imprisonment, suspended after ten years for the balance to be served at Level IV DOC Discretion, suspended after six months for eighteen months of Level III probation. Under 11 Del. C. § 1448(c), possession of a deadly weapon by a person prohibited is a Class C felony if the defendant is eligible for sentencing under 11 Del. C. § 1448(e)(1)c. The appellant concedes that he was eligible for sentencing under 11 Del. C. § 1448(e)(1)c. The defendant was therefore subject to a sentencing range between ten years1 and fifteen years of imprisonment.2 The Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by denying the appellant’s motion to modify his sentence to eliminate the Level IV and Level III periods.3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT: /s/ Karen L. Valihura Justice

See 11 Del. C. § 1448(e)(1)c (requiring a “minimum sentence” of “[t]en years at Level V”).

See 11 Del. C. § 4205(b)(3) (providing a sentencing range for a Class C felony of “up to 15 years to be served at Level V”).

See Gladden v. State, 2020 WL 773290 (Del. Feb. 17, 2020) (“We review the Superior Court’s denial of a motion for sentence modification for abuse of discretion.”).