Shaw v. Division of Child Support Services/Payne Y Payne
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MYLES SHAW,1 §
§
Respondent Below, § No. 270, 2023 Appellant, §
§ Court Below—Family Court v. § of the State of Delaware
§
DIVISION OF CHILD SUPPORT § File No. CK21-01585 SERVICES/CLARE PAYNE Y § Petition No. 22-24383 PAYNE, §
§
Petitioner Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: August 10, 2023 Decided: August 11, 2023
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LeGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to the Court that:
(1) On August 4, 2023, the appellant, Myles Shaw, filed this appeal from a Family Court Commissioner’s order, dated July 20, 2023, requiring him to pay child support. The Senior Court Clerk issued a notice directing Shaw to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for this Court’s lack of jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.
(2) In his response to the notice to show cause, Shaw challenges the merits of the order on appeal. He does not address the jurisdictional defect.
(3) A party’s right to appeal from a Commissioner’s order is to a judge of the Family Court.2 This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal directly from a Family Court Commissioner’s order.3 This appeal must therefore be dismissed.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), that this appeal is DISMISSED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
Justice
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.