Jamison v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEAN JAMISON, § § No. 325, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 9910021436 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Appellee. § Submitted: February 25, 2025 Decided: March 31, 2025 Before VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, and LEGROW, Justices.
ORDER After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we affirm on the basis of the Superior Court’s order dated July 12, 2024. Whether the withholding of postconviction relief in this case is appropriately characterized as summary dismissal or denial is immaterial.
The motion for postconviction relief, the appellant’s second, was filed more than one year after the judgment of conviction became final, and both judges correctly concluded that the motion did not plead any circumstances under Rule 61(d)(2)(i) or (d)(2)(ii).1 The motion did not overcome the procedural bars set forth in Rule 61.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court be AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT: /s/ Gary F. Traynor Justice
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.