Ray v. State
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE REUEL RAY, §
§ No. 169, 2025 Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below—Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. §
§ Cr. ID No. 1210020570A (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, §
§
Appellee. §
Submitted: May 28, 2025
Decided: July 9, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order dated March 19, 2025. The Superior Court previously addressed the appellant’s argument about credit time.1 The appellant did not appeal from that ruling, nor has he shown in this appeal that he has not received credit for all time served. The appellant’s argument that his sentence is in violation of 11 Del. C. § 4204(l) is without merit. As the Superior Court concluded, Section 4204(l) required the court to include as part of the appellant’s sentence at least six months at Level II, III, or IV.2 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.