Gaskill v. Montague
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision.
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Mary Boutique, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
- Annis v. Gang (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964)
- Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc. (Fla. 1963)
- Hutchins v. City of Hialeah (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
- Morton v. Staples (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)
- Webb's City, Inc. v. Lugerner (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1962)
- Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. Simpson (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
- Ponte v. Lattin (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1961)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
In this action for damages for personal injuries a jury verdict rendered for the defendant was set aside and plaintiffs’ motion for new trial was granted. No grounds were stated in the order, as they are required to be by § 59.07(4), Fla.Stat., F.S.A., and rule 2.6(d), F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A. Defendant’s appeal assigned as error the failure of the order granting new trial to state any grounds therefor. See Booker v. Saunders Realty Co., Fla.1951, 53 So.2d 912; Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App. 1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240.
The order appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions, as provided for in said § 59.04, id., “that final judgment be entered in the trial court for the party obtaining the verdict, unless motion in arrest of judgment or for judgment non obstante veredicto be made and prevail.”
Reversed and remanded.
Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.