Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1961

Republic of Cuba v. Ritter

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 15, 1961 · Carroll, Chas, Norton, Smith

130 So. 2d 98; 1961 Fla. App. LEXIS 2735 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Danluck v. Lotspeich Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
Stein v. Bayfront Medical Center, Inc. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1973)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal which sought to review certain interlocutory rulings in an action at law. The appeal was improvidently filed because interlocutory appeals in common-law actions are limited to those orders relating to venue or jurisdiction over *99the person.1 As authorized by statute,2 we have treated the notice of appeal as a petition for common-law certiorari. See Ludwig v. Cochran, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 484; Kautzman v. Bandler, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 256.

The burden of clearly demonstrating that the trial court has acted without and in excess of its jurisdiction or its rulings do not conform to the essential requirements of the law is upon the petitioners. They have failed to carry this burden and by reason thereof, the petition for certiorari should be and it is hereby denied.

It is so ordered.

Norton, c. j., carroll, chas., J., slnd SMITH, D. R., Associate Judge, concur.

. Rule 4.2, subd. a, Florida Appellate Rules, Fla.Stat., 31 F.S.A.

. Section 59.45, Fla.Stat., F.S.A.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.