Gross v. Ruskin
Gross v. Ruskin
133 So. 2d 759
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Gross v. Ruskin
Opinion of the Court
The appellants each owned a leasehold interest in separate stores. They appeal from an order apportioning a condemnation award pursuant to Section 73.12, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The additional damages claimed were for relocation, depreciation and loss of business. Such damages are not recoverable by a lessee. See Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 8; Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth., Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 687.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.