Gross v. Ruskin

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Gross v. Ruskin, 133 So. 2d 759 (1961)
Barkdull, Horton, Pearson, Tillman

Gross v. Ruskin

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellants each owned a leasehold interest in separate stores. They appeal from an order apportioning a condemnation award pursuant to Section 73.12, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. The additional damages claimed were for relocation, depreciation and loss of business. Such damages are not recoverable by a lessee. See Romy v. Dade County, Fla.App.1959, 114 So.2d 8; Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth., Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 687.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Arnold GROSS Perry Hall and Albert H. Nobles, d/b/a C & W Barbershop and Grables Bakery, Inc. v. Michael J. RUSKIN and Rose R. Ruskin, his wife Joseph R. Ruskin and Marjorie B. Ruskin, his wife and Harold Spigel and Bertha Spigel, his wife
Cited By
5 cases
Status
Published