Cataldo v. Stahl
Cataldo v. Stahl
137 So. 2d 875
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cataldo v. Stahl
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
It is my view that the summary final judgment entered in this case should be reversed under the rule stated in Smith v. City of Daytona Beach, Fla.App.1960, 121 So.2d 440, 442 and Schneider v. K. S. B. Realty & Investing Corp., Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 398, 399.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.