Spitzer Motors of Miami, Inc. v. Gates
Spitzer Motors of Miami, Inc. v. Gates
144 So. 2d 877
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Spitzer Motors of Miami, Inc. v. Gates
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
The appellee recovered a judgment based on a jury verdict, for damages for injuries received when she fell on appellant’s business premises. I agree with the majority that negligence was shown, but would reverse for new trial for refusal to charge on contributory negligence, as to which, in my opinion, the evidence presented a jury question. I, therefore, respectfully dissent.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.