Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1963

Hutchins v. City of Hialeah

Hutchins v. City of Hialeah
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 4, 1963 · Carroll, Donald, Hendry, Horton
153 So. 2d 864; 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3282 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Hutchins v. City of Hialeah

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

We are confronted again with an appeal from an order granting a new trial which failed to include a statement by the trial judge of any ground or grounds upon which such order was based, as required by statute and court rule (§ 59.07(4) Fla.Stat., F.S.A., rule 2.8(f) F.R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.). The absence of grounds in the order requires reversal. See Ebersole v. Tepperman, Fla.1953, 65 So.2d 564; Means v. Douglas, Fla.App.1959, 110 So.2d 88; Fulton v. Poston Bridge & Iron, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 122 So.2d 240; Gaskill v. Montague, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 420; Ponte v. Lattin, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 260; Morton v. Staples, Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 806; Hammett v. Lyte Lyne, Inc., Fla.1950, 150 So.2d 235. The order for new trial is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions to reinstate the verdict and judgment.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.