Hope v. Lipkin
Cases that cite this one
7 later published cases cite this decision.
- Fickle v. Adkins (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
- Tubbs v. Mechanik Nuccio Hearne & Wester, P.A. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2013)
- Brown v. Brown (In re Brown) (United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida 1994)
- Valparaiso Bank & Trust Co. v. Sims (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
- Wolf v. Horton (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1976)
- Varvel v. Varvel (Lake County Circuit Court 1971)
- Novack v. Novack (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1967)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The right to attorneys’ fees is derivative in nature when representing the wife in a divorce action. See: Smith v. Smith, 90 Fla. 824, 107 So. 257. Counsel for the wife have attempted to take an appeal in their individual names and not on behalf of the wife. Never having been parties of record in the trial court, they have no standing to prosecute such an appeal. See: Salomon v. Taylor, 50 Fla. 608, 39 So. 48; King v. Brown, Fla.1951, 55 So.2d 187; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 55. Therefore, same is hereby dismissed,
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.