Lake v. Stiegler
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Cahill ex rel. Utz v. Cooney (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)
- Pan American Life Insurance Company v. Raij (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1963)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, appeals an adverse summary judgment, contending that there was a material issue of fact to be presented to the jury as to whether or not the appellee negligently operated a motor vehicle under his control.
An examination of the record fails to demonstrate that the appellee acted other than as a reasonable person under the emergency circumstances created by the appellant-driver. Therefore, no error has been made to appear in the entry of the summary judgment. See: Harper v. Mangel, Fla.App.1963, 151 So.2d 346.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.