Petitioner, who was plaintiff in the lower court, filed its petition for writ of certi-orari to review an order denying its motion to strike the defendant-respondent’s counterclaim.

We find nothing in the record that would preclude the petitioner-plaintiff from having an adequate and complete remedy by appeal after final judgment. We find nothing that would justify, in effect, an interlocutory appeal in this law action.

Certiorari denied.