McClendon v. State
McClendon v. State
164 So. 2d 28; 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4249
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McClendon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, denied in an order here appealed, fails to allege facts constituting a claim for relief under the aforementioned Rule. Although it appears that the lower court’s order denying the motion was based in part on matters dehors the record, we must, because of the aforementioned insufficiency of the motion, affirm. Cf. Webster v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 890.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.