The appellant, former husband, presents for review the financial provisions of a decree of divorce. The sole point presented is that the chancellor erred in requiring alimony and child support in the amounts set. The appellant has failed to show an abuse of discretion by the chancellor and the decree is affirmed upon the rule stated in Pross v. Pross, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 671, 672.

Affirmed.