Nolan v. Eshleman
Nolan v. Eshleman
Opinion of the Court
In the trial, court verdict and judgment was rendered for the defendant and against the plaintiff. The judgment included costs assessed in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. The plaintiff appealed. He did not pay the costs taxed against him in the judgment. He assigned as error the taxation of costs but has not superseded the judgment taxing costs. The time for filing assignments of error has passed. Time for filing the record on appeal in this court has not yet arrived. Ap-pellee moves to dismiss for failure of the appellant, original plaintiff, to comply with Florida Appellate Rule 3.2(f), 31 F.S.A.
The status of this case, the position of the parties and the arguments advanced by
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.