Goswick v. Mittelman

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Goswick v. Mittelman, 177 So. 2d 253 (1965)
1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3920
Carroll, Pearson, Swann

Goswick v. Mittelman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The appellant urges the insufficiency of the proof upon the entry of a summary final *254decree of foreclosure. An examination of the record reveals that the appellant, as defendant, filed no answer other than a general denial and offered no affidavit or other type of proof at the hearing on the motion. The plaintiff, appellee, offered sworn testimony sufficient to establish a prima facie case. Under these circumstances, the chancellor properly entered the summary decree appealed. See Hardcastle v. Mobley, Fla.App.1962, 143 So.2d 715; Kelly v. Patek, Fla.App.1965, 172 So. 2d 520.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
C. E. and Betty GOSWICK v. Samuel MITTELMAN and Rose Mittelman, his wife
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published