Harris v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal July 27, 1965

Harris v. State, 177 So. 2d 543 (1965)

1965 Fla. App. LEXIS 3973

Carroll, Hendry, Swann

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal of an order denying a petition for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix.

The appellant was indicted and tried for rape. He was found guilty by a jury which recommended mercy. He was then adjudged guilty and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Examination of the numerous allegations in the motion reveals that many are conclusions of the movant unsupported by factual allegations and could have been summarily dismissed.1 Nevertheless, the trial court conducted a full evidentiary hearing at which appellant was present. We are impressed by the fact that the circuit court gave the appellant full opportunity to present his proof.

*544 As was pointed out in Johnson v. Zerbst2 and reiterated in Twining v. United States,3 the burden of proof is upon the appellant to prove his allegations. Such proof must overcome the presumption of validity which attends the judgment attacked.4 Appellant’s proof fell far short of sustaining his burden.

No error in any respect having been made to appear the order of the trial court will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

. Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 83 S.Ct. 1068, 10 L.Ed.2d 148 (1963); Sampson v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So. 2d 771; Smith v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 383 (Not yet reported, opinion filed June 22, 1965).

. 304 U.S. 458, 58 S.Ct. 1019, 82 L.Ed. 1461 (1938); see also Russ v. State, Fla. 1957, 95 So.2d 594.

. 321 F.2d 432 (C.O.A.5, 1963).

. Notes 2 and 3 supra.

Reference

Full Case Name: Clinton Wilbert HARRIS v. STATE of Florida
Cited By: 5 cases
Status: Published