Holen v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.
Holen v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed upon authority of the rule stated in Oren v. General Accident Fire and Life Assur. Corp., Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 581. See also Continental Cas. Co. v. Weckes,
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting).
I respectfully dissent. The provision excluding coverage of relatives of the insured “if there is any other valid and collectible medical payments or passenger accident insurance available to such relatives,” should not be construed to bar recovery by plaintiff (relative) of the unpaid $1,500 balance of her $2,500 medical expense, when the “other valid and collectible insurance” was only for $1,000.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.