Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1966

Otis v. Wieder

Otis v. Wieder
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided February 1, 1966 · Barkdull, Carroll, Pearson
183 So. 2d 235; 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5508 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Otis v. Wieder

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The order of the trial judge dismissing appellant’s counterclaim, for failure to state a cause of action, is affirmed upon authority of Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 746. See also Weekley v. Knight, 116 Fla. 721, 156 So. 625 (1934); Suritz v. Kelner, Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 831; Campbell v. Magana, 184 Cal.App.2d 751, 8 Cal.Rptr. 32 (1960); and anno., 45 A.L.R.2d 5.

Appellant’s contention that she was deprived of an opportunity to amend her counterclaim is conclusively refuted by the record.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.