Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1966

Grizzell v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided June 7, 1966 · Carroll, Donald, Johnson, Wigginton

187 So. 2d 342; 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 5456 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

6 later published cases cite this decision.

Meneses v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1979)
Brooks v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1968)
State v. Meneses (Fla. 1981)
Daniels v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Hurst v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Barton v. State (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1966)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

PER CURIAM.

Grizzell filed a motion to vacate-in the lower court pursuant to Criminal-Procedure Rule 1, Ch. 924, F.S.A. Appendix. Upon consideration of the Rule-1 motion the lower court entered its order-reciting that it could not entertain said', motion because a direct appeal from Griz-zell’s criminal conviction was presently-pending before the District Court of Appeal, First District, which order in effect denied the Rule 1 motion. From this-order Grizzell then appealed to this Court,, filed a brief and the State then filed', a motion to quash or dismiss the appeal..

*343We are of the opinion that the lower court was correct in denying the Rule 1 motion because the direct appeal which is now pending in this court places all jurisdiction in this court until the determination of the appeal.

The motion to dismiss is hereby granted.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.