Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1966

In re Estate of Friedman

In re Estate of Friedman
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 1, 1966 · Carroll, Hendry, Pearson
191 So. 2d 310; 1966 Fla. App. LEXIS 4508 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

In re Estate of Friedman

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal a legatee who was. a daughter of the decedent seeks reversal of an order of the county judge’s court of Dade County denying her petition for-*311revocation of probate of the decedent’s will. The contention presented by the appellant is that the will was not properly executed. The findings of the county judge that the will was properly signed by the testator, attested and published, are amply supported by the evidence. Under the established rule that such a decision of a probate court will not be disturbed on appeal unless the legal effect of the evidence has been misapprehended or there is a lack of evidence to support the findings, we conclude that no reversible error has been made to appear. See Gair v. Lockhart, Fla. 1950, 45 So.2d 193; Skelton v. Davis, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 432, 89 A.L.R.2d 1114; In re Winans’ Estate, Fla.App.1961, 133 So.2d 473.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.