Friedman v. Florida State Board of Architecture
Friedman v. Florida State Board of Architecture
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner, William M. Friedman, seeks review of an order of the State Board of Architecture, which suspended his registration as an architect for six months on two charges filed against him by the Board.
His petition for certiorari is sought under Article V, Section 5(3), Florida Constitution, F.S.A., and Section 120.31(1), Florida Statutes, F.S.A., because no method of review for this penalty is provided in Chapter 467, Florida Statutes, F.S.A., which governs the practice of architecture in Florida.
After review of the record and briefs, we find that the charge against the petitioner as to Count One was properly and sufficiently proven. The record, however, fails to establish that the charges against the petitioner under Count Two were properly or sufficiently proven.
It is so ordered.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.