This is an appeal from an order confirming an arbitration award made pursuant to the uninsured motorist coverage. The appellant attempted to argue in the circuit court, and later in this court, its version of the weight of the evidence. The chancellor correctly held that the petitioner had failed to state grounds for vacating the award. See Fla.Stat. § 57.22, F.S.A.; Kest v. Nathanson, Fla.App.1966, 184 So.2d 690.

Affirmed.