Selmon v. State
Selmon v. State
195 So. 2d 249; 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5340
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Selmon v. State
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed under the authority of Dancy v. State, Fla.App.1965, 175 So.2d 208; Clark v. State, Fla.App.1965, 174 So.2d 773; Byers v. State, Fla.App.1964, 163 So.2d 57; Duncan v. State, Fla.App. 1964, 161 So.2d 718; Taylor v. State, Fla.App. 1965, 171
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.