Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1967

Riley v. State

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 1, 1967 · Allen, Hob, Pierce, Son

195 So. 2d 635; 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 5380 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed under the authority of Hinton v. State, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 522; Savage v. State, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 566; Stacey v. State, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 222; and Dias v. State, Fla.App.1963, 158 So.2d 766.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A

ALLEN, C. J., and PIERCE and HOB-SON, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.