Harris v. Jewett
Harris v. Jewett
Opinion of the Court
Petitioner seeks the issuance of a common law writ of certiorari,
In ordering the production of the photographs, we do not find'that the trial judge departed from the essential requirements of law. See: Miami Transit Co. v. Hurns, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 390; Pierson v. Seale, Fla.App.1961, 128 So.2d 887. However, we quash the order adjudicating the plaintiff in contempt for failure to comply with the first order of production, because this order did not comply with the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. See: Rule 1.28, F.R.C.P., 30 F.S.A.; Fryd Construction Corporation v. Freeman, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 487.
It is so ordered.
. See: Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Timmons, Fla.1952, 61 So.2d 426; Goldstein v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 256; Van Devere v. Holmes, Fla.App.1963, 156 So.2d 899.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thelma HARRIS v. Kenneth JEWETT and Sea Land Service, Inc.
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published