Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1967

Hennig v. Hennig

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided May 10, 1967 · Hendry, Pearson, Swann

201 So. 2d 88; 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4572 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

070rehearing

ON REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

This cause was originally dismissed, sua sponte, by the court as an appeal from an order which was not final. Appellant was granted a rehearing on the order of dismissal, at which the appellee conceded that the decree was a final adjudication upon the merits. See old Rule 1.35(b), 1954 Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 30 F.S.A., as amended. We thereupon reinstate this appeal and proceed to consider the issues raised herein. We find this to be of no avail because we have not been provided with a complete and sufficient record upon which to review the issues involved. We must, therefore, affirm.1

Affirmed.

. Morceau v. Meader, Fla.App.1965, 179 So.2d 242; Wilder v. Altman, Fla.App. 1965, 179 So.2d 250; Williams v. Williams, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 488.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The court, sua sponte, dismisses this appeal, inasmuch as it is an appeal from an order which is not final.

It is so ordered.

Before PEARSON, HENDRY, and SWANN, JJ.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.