We affirm the action of the trial judge in dismissing the amended complaint with prejudice. It sought recovery on a purported advertising contract involving a campaign for political office.

The contract sued upon was not executed by a campaign treasurer or deputy campaign treasurer, in accordance with § 99.161(4) (a) (5) (6), Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. Therefore, the trial judge was eminently correct under the authority of Schaal v. Race, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 252.

Affirmed.