McKinzy v. State
McKinzy v. State
209 So. 2d 701; 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 5683
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
McKinzy v. State
Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from appellant’s conviction after a non-jury trial upon the charge of assault with intent to commit robbery. The appellant argues that the evidence as to identity contained in the trial record is unclear and is insufficient to identify him as the person who assaulted the complaining witness. Our review of the record convinces us that this argument is without basis. See Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.