The only testimony relative to value during the trial of these defendants for grand larceny and breaking and entering a dwelling house with intent to commit grand larceny is the following:

“Q. Would you tell the Jury what was missing?

A. A stereo, two TV’s, á Hallicrafter ship-to-shore radio, a watch, some records.

Q. All right. And what value did you place on all of this ?

A. Eight hundred.

Q. Eight hundred dollars ?

A. (Witness nodded affirmatively.)”

This is insufficient. Suarez v. State, 136 So.2d 367 (2d D.C.A.Fla. 1962).

The other points raised by appellants are without merit. Pursuant to Florida Statutes § 924.34 (1967), F.S.A., judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded with instruction to enter judgment of conviction on the lesser included offenses and to pass sentence accordingly.