Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1968

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 8, 1968 · Barkdull, Carroll, Hendry
214 So. 2d 492 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Washington Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse declaratory judgment determining a clause of a letter agreement.

The agreement in question was prepared by representatives of the plaintiff. It contained an ambiguity. The trial judge resolved the ambiguity in favor of the ap-pellee, Washington Federal Savings and Loan Association of Miami Beach, and we find no error in his construction. McGhee Interests, Inc. v. Alexander National Bank, 102 Fla. 140, 135 So. 545; Clark v. Clark, Fla.1955, 79 So.2d 426; Hall v. Hall, Fla. App.1961, 135 So.2d 432; Bacon v. Karr, Fla.App. 1962, 139 So.2d 166, 7 A.L.R.3d 889; Nat Harrison Associates, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light Company, Fla.App. 1964, 162 So.2d 298; Allegheny Mutual Casualty Company v. State, Fla.App.1965, 176 So.2d 362; S & W Motors v. Mack Trucks, Inc., Fla.App. 1967, 198 So.2d 70; 7 Fla.Jur., Contracts, §§ 73, 74 and 87.

Therefore, the declaratory judgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.