Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1968

Claridy v. Claridy

Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 4, 1968 · Owen, Reed, Walden

216 So. 2d 56; 1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4661 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the record before us, appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Johanson v. Insua, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 247.

WALDEN, C. J., REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

070rehearing

PER CURIAM.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

On petition for rehearing, we have reviewed the record and the briefs and reaffirm our decision of November 4, 1968. However, by way of clarification, we would point out that although appellant may have presented as much of the record as it was possible for him to present, the record nonetheless does not show adequate ground for reversal.

Petition for rehearing is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.