Plissner v. Goodall Rubber Co.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Plissner v. Goodall Rubber Co., 216 So. 2d 228 (1968)
1968 Fla. App. LEXIS 4680
Barkdull, Carroll, Pearson

Plissner v. Goodall Rubber Co.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The only question presented upon this appeal is whether the trial judge’s finding was against the manifest weight of the evidence. The court was called upon to construe a lease between the parties and determine whether it prohibited a certain activity.

The suit was for an injunction and, therefore, governed by equitable principles. There was evidence that the parties had by their own acts agreed upon the construction which the court gave to the lease. We conclude that the appellant has not demonstrated error.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harry PLISSNER v. GOODALL RUBBER COMPANY, a New Jersey corporation
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published