Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1969

Haywood v. State

Haywood v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided January 15, 1969 · Hobson, Mann, Pierce
218 So. 2d 242; 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6252 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Haywood v. State

Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

Appellant contends that his petition under Rule 1.850, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., was *243erroneously denied without an evidentiary hearing. The petition alleges improper reception of a guilty plea. The record indicates that the trial judge asked a long and appropriate series of questions the answers to which indicate clearly that the appellant knowingly and intelligently entered a plea of guilty.

Oral argument is dispensed with as serving no useful purpose pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

HOBSON, A. C. J., and PIERCE, J., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.