Haywood v. State
Haywood v. State
218 So. 2d 242; 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6252
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Haywood v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant contends that his petition under Rule 1.850, F.R.C.P., 33 F.S.A., was
Oral argument is dispensed with as serving no useful purpose pursuant to Rule 3.10, subd. e, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.