Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd., 219 So. 2d 67 (1969)
1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6138
Gooding, Marion, Owen, Walden

Bodzo v. Harbour Associates, Ltd.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, suing for real state commissions allegedly due him from defendants, suffered an adverse final judgment and appeals. All of the questions raised on *68appeal turn on factual issues and from a review of the record we find contained therein competent, substantial evidence to sustain the finding's of the trial court who tried the case without a jury. Under such circumstances we are not entitled to substitute our judgment for that of the trier of fact. First Atlantic National Bank of Daytona Beach v. Cobbett, Fla.1955, 82 So.2d 870; Tucker v. Forty-Five Twenty-Five, Inc., Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 522; Leeb v. Read, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 830.

WALDEN, C. J., OWEN, J., and GOODING, MARION W, Associate Judge, concur.

Reference

Full Case Name
Stephen J. BODZO v. HARBOUR ASSOCIATES, LTD., a limited partnership, and Morris H. Lazarus, Malcolm H. Lazarus and Charles E. Crockett, individually and as general partners doing business under the partnership name of Harbour Associates, Ltd.
Cited By
2 cases
Status
Published