Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1969

Braxton v. State

Braxton v. State
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided September 30, 1969 · Barkdull, Carroll, Pearson
226 So. 2d 692; 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5339 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Braxton v. State

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, defendant in the criminal court of record, seeks review of his conviction for armed robbery. The only issue preserved is the sufficiency of the evidence on identification of the culprit.

A review of the record reveals substantial, competent evidence which, if believed by the trier of fact, establishes beyond and to the exclusion of a reasonable doubt that the appellant was the culprit and, therefore, the judgment of conviction and sentence here under review should be affirmed upon the authority of Wright v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 264; Yant v. State, Fla.App.1966, 192 So.2d 297; Parker v. State, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 476.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.