Southern Home Insurance v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance
Southern Home Insurance v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance
227 So. 2d 691
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Southern Home Insurance v. Manhattan Fire & Marine Insurance
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed.
Dissenting Opinion
(dissenting) :
This case concerns two insurance companies who issued policies of insurance covering the same risk, each company claiming coverage as being excess over any other valid and collectible insurance. I would prorate the liability according to their policy limits. See Pacific Indemnity Company v. Federated American Insurance Company, Wash.1969, 456 P.2d 331.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.