City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman
City of Pompano Beach v. Oltman
228 So. 2d 610
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
5 later published cases cite this decision.
- Appel v. Scott (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
- Oltman v. City of Pompano Beach (Broward County Circuit Court 1977)
- Maszewski v. Piskadlo (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
- Cochran ex rel. Cochran v. Swindell (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1972)
- Glidden Co. v. Zuckerman (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1971)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
A judgment for the defendant on a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 1.140(c), RCP, 30 F.S.A., may not be granted on the basis of allegations in the defendant’s answer where no reply is required because such allegations are deemed denied, Miller v. Eatmon, Fla.App.1965, 177 So.2d 523. For this reason, we affirm the order of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.