Seely v. Hertz Corp.
Seely v. Hertz Corp.
231 So. 2d 547; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6951
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Seely v. Hertz Corp.
Opinion of the Court
We have examined the record and the appellate presentation and find that the presumption of correctness which accompanies orders allowing a new trial has not been overcome. No abuse of discretion having been demonstrated, the order granting a new trial is hereby affirmed. Cloud v. Fallis, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 669; City of Fort Pierce v. Cooper, Fla.App.1966, 190 So.2d 12; and Volk v. Goetz, Fla.App. 1967, 206 So.2d 250; 2 Fla.Jur., Appeals, § 317.
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.