Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1970

Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.

Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided March 3, 1970 · Hendry, Pearson, Swann
232 So. 2d 213; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6780 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Plastic Dynamics Corp. v. Lincoln Investment Corp.

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment entered for the defendants at the conclusion of a non-jury trial. The single point presented urges that the trial court committed prejudicial error when it denied plaintiff’s proffer of extrinsic evidence as to the intent of the parties to the contract. The proffer consisted of testimony that the parties intended Philip R. Consolo would be personally liable on a contract.

The decision of the trial court that the contract is not ambiguous and that Consolo was not personally liable is amply supported by the holding in Delta Airlines, Inc. v. Wilson, Fla.App.1968, 210 So.2d 761.

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.