Kaplan v. Sturm

Florida District Courts of Appeal
Kaplan v. Sturm, 234 So. 2d 390 (1970)
1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6516
McCain, Reed, Walden

Kaplan v. Sturm

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff charges that defense counsel in a negligence action made improper remarks during his closing argument and that the damages awarded plaintiff by the jury were legally inadequate. The only jury issue was that of damages and the trial court denied plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. We have examined the record and considered the briefs and arguments of counsel and conclude that no harmful or reversible error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

WALDEN and McCAIN, JJ., concur. REED, J., dissents, without opinion.

Reference

Full Case Name
Harry KAPLAN v. John STURM
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published