Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1970

Arnold v. McGrady

Arnold v. McGrady
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided October 7, 1970 · Hobson, Nulty, Pierce
239 So. 2d 854; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5863 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Arnold v. McGrady

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion for a new trial.

During the course of the trial certain safety rules and regulations adopted by one of the appellants, Greyhound Lines, Inc., were admitted into evidence. The trial court denied the appellee’s requested in*855struction as to the legal effect to be given such evidence.

After hearing the appellee’s motion for a new trial, the trial court determined that it had erred in failing to instruct the jury as requested by appellee.

Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we find that the appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error and, therefore,

Affirmed.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and Mc-NULTY, JJ., concur.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.