Arnold v. McGrady
Arnold v. McGrady
239 So. 2d 854; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5863
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Arnold v. McGrady
Opinion of the Court
Appellants appeal the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion for a new trial.
During the course of the trial certain safety rules and regulations adopted by one of the appellants, Greyhound Lines, Inc., were admitted into evidence. The trial court denied the appellee’s requested in
After hearing the appellee’s motion for a new trial, the trial court determined that it had erred in failing to instruct the jury as requested by appellee.
Upon consideration of the briefs and record on appeal we find that the appellants have failed to demonstrate reversible error and, therefore,
Affirmed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.