Florida District Courts of Appeal, 1970

Dunn v. Baessler

Dunn v. Baessler
Florida District Courts of Appeal · Decided November 4, 1970 · Cooper, Reed, Richard, Walden
242 So. 2d 780; 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 5392 (Southern Reporter, Second Series)

Dunn v. Baessler

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

On the basis of the briefs, record, and oral argument, it is our opinion that neither appellant nor the appellees who cross-assigned error have demonstrated reversible *781error; therefore, the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

REED, J., and COOPER, RICHARD H., Associate Judge, concur. WALDEN, J., dissents, with opinion.

Dissenting Opinion

WALDEN, Judge

(dissenting).

It is my view that the trial court erred in its disposition of Count IV of Plaintiff’s -amended complaint.

I,therefore, dissent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.