Tucker v. State
Tucker v. State
243 So. 2d 186
(Southern Reporter, Second Series)
Tucker v. State
Opinion of the Court
Appellant Tucker alleges that as a result of threats and coercive treatment, he made statements which were used against him to force him into pleading guilty. Nothing in the record refutes his allegations, and Tucker therefore should be granted an evidentiary hearing. Rudolph v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 14; Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.
Reversed and remanded with directions.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.