Appellant was adjudicated guilty and sentenced to be confined at hard labor for the term of six months to five years after a jury trial on charges of unlawful escape from confinement.

A careful study and consideration of the record on appeal, briefs and oral arguments of counsel in this case reveals that the evidence wás sufficient to sustain a conviction under the charge of escape. The facts constituted a jury question and was resolved by the jury adversely to appellant, and this court will not substitute its judgment therefor.

The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.